environment agency | Save the Planet

Microplastic pollution reaches crisis point in UK waters

By David Shepherd|2025-01-02T17:55:45+00:00January 2nd, 2025|

With the strain on the inland rivers and coastal waterways in the UK, plastic pollution has become a major environmental issue. Despite growing awareness and efforts to curb the issue, evidence reveals that the scale of plastic contamination remains alarming, threatening ecosystems, wildlife, and human health.

Extent of Plastic Pollution

Recent studies conducted by environmental organisations and research institutions provide a sobering picture of the UK’s waterways. According to a 2023 report by the UK Environment Agency, microplastics were detected in 80% of surveyed river sites. These tiny plastic fragments, often invisible to the naked eye, originate from degraded larger plastics, synthetic clothing fibres, and microbeads used in cosmetics and cleaning products.

Larger plastic debris is also prevalent. A joint study by the Marine Conservation Society (MCS) and Keep Britain Tidy revealed that over 1 million plastic items are found per year on UK beaches during organised clean-ups. Inland rivers such as the Thames and Mersey act as conduits, carrying this waste to the sea. Research published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology highlights that the Thames alone deposits an estimated 94,000 microplastics per second into the North Sea.

Sources of Pollution

The sources of plastic pollution in UK waters are diverse and often interlinked. Mismanaged waste disposal, littering, and industrial activities contribute significantly. Single-use plastics—including bottles, packaging, and cigarette filters—account for a large portion of the debris found in both rivers and coastal regions. Additionally, urban runoff during rainfall events washes plastics into drainage systems, ultimately discharging them into natural water bodies.

Agricultural practices are also implicated. Plastic mulches and polymer-based fertilisers contribute to soil contamination, which is then transported to rivers through surface runoff. Furthermore, wastewater treatment plants, which are not fully effective at filtering microplastics, act as a secondary source of contamination.

Ecological and Economic Impact

The environmental consequences of plastic pollution are profound. Wildlife, including fish, birds, and marine mammals, faces dire risks. A 2022 study by the University of Exeter found plastic ingestion in 33% of fish species sampled from UK waters, with potential implications for food chains and human consumption.

Economic costs are also substantial. The tourism and fishing industries suffer from degraded environments, while local councils bear increasing expenses for clean-up operations. The damage to marine ecosystems disrupts fisheries, affecting livelihoods and regional economies dependent on sustainable fish stocks.

Mitigation Efforts and Challenges

In response to the crisis, the UK government and environmental groups have implemented various measures. The introduction of the plastic bag charge and bans on microbeads are positive steps. However, these efforts are insufficient to address the root causes comprehensively.

Innovative solutions, such as Thames21’s river clean-up initiatives and technological advancements in microplastic filtration, have shown promise. Yet, challenges persist. Inadequate enforcement of existing regulations, limited recycling infrastructure, and continued consumer reliance on plastic products hinder progress.

Sources

UK Environment Agency (2023 Report): This report provides information on the activities regulated by the Environment Agency in 2022, including compliance of businesses with environmental permits and emissions.
GOV.UK
Marine Conservation Society (MCS) and Keep Britain Tidy: The Marine Conservation Society’s ‘State of Our Beaches’ report highlights the need to cut plastic pollution, detailing the amount of litter collected from UK beaches.
Dive Magazine
University of Manchester Study on Microplastics in Rivers: This study reveals severe levels of microplastic pollution within the Medina Estuary, highlighting the environmental crisis in the Isle of Wight estuary.
Phys.org
University of Exeter (2022 Study): This study found that 100% of animals washed up on British shores had plastic in their stomachs, indicating the widespread impact of plastic pollution on wildlife.
Keep Britain Tidy
CHEMTrust: How bad is the micro plastic pollution in our rivers? CHEMTrust

Should Thames Water be allowed to fail ?

By David Shepherd|2025-01-02T17:00:14+00:00December 31st, 2024|

Thames Water, the UK’s largest water provider with nearly 16 million users, is currently facing serious financial issues. Should it be allowed to fall into administration?

As of December 2024, the company’s debt exceeded £19 billion, raising questions about its operational viability and the likelihood for government intervention.

It recorded an operational deficit of £189 million in the first half of 2024, attributable to pollution penalties, consultancy payouts, and losses on inter-company loans. The corporation also faced exceptional charges of £465 million, including a £104 million provision for anticipated fines and a £40 million restructuring program.

This significant debt burden has stretched its financial resources, limiting its capacity to invest in critical infrastructure projects. Thomas Water has stated that it may run out of money by March 2025.

A 40% increase in pollution events has resulted in substantial fines, severely stressing the company’s budget. Thames Water was fined £18.2 million by Ofwat in December 2024 for violating dividend regulations on payments made in 2023 and 2024. Ofwat also stated that it will “claw back value” to recover £131 million of the payments.

Should Thames Water be allowed to fail ?

Thames Water is currently seeking permission for a potential £3 billion financial rescue package to address its current financial challenges – but will a new bail-out be merely “kicking the can down the road” ?

As an alternative, going into administration would support a full restructuring of the company’s operations, allowing a greater focus on efficiency and service quality without the immediate strain of debt commitments. This procedure then gets an opportunity to fix the root causes that have hampered the company’s performance over years of managed decline.

Administration allows the opportunity to reorganise or reduce the company’s significant debt, relieving financial pressures and creating a more sustainable economic model, thus increasing the company’s capacity to invest in vital infrastructure and environmental initiative.

A government-appointed administrator would verify that the company’s activities are in the public’s best interests, potentially leading to increased environmental compliance and customer service standards. This oversight has the potential to rebuild public trust while also ensuring regulatory compliance.

The administration of such a large utility may encourage a rethinking of the regulatory and ownership arrangements in the UK’s water industry, potentially leading to broader reforms that benefit both consumers and the environment. This may involve talks on alternative ownership arrangements, such as mutual or cooperative structures.

What are the potential downsides and risks ?

Going into administration, it will be critical to provide service continuity throughout: uninterrupted water supply and wastewater services during the transition period to preserve public health and safety.

The restructuring process will cause job uncertainty for Thames Water’s personnel, needing appropriate communication and support measures to address employee concerns.

To the financial markets, allowing a large utility to fall into administration might have a broader impact on investor confidence in the UK’s regulated industries, potentially influencing future investment and financing in the sector.

It will be critical to strike a compromise between Thames Water’s immediate requirements and the industry’s overall stability but the question remains: why shouldn’t Thames Water be allowed to fail and give us an opportunity to reset and renew, as a template for the UK water industry going forward, utilising a new mutual or cooperative model ?

Time’s up for the mismanagement of the UK’s most precious resource – our rivers and coastal waters

By David Shepherd|2023-03-02T13:58:40+00:00March 2nd, 2023|

For years, the UK’s management of its rivers and coastal waters has been deteriorating at a greater pace than we have seen since the Industrial Revolution and has never been fit for purpose. With the pace of deterioration of our water quality accelerating at a truly alarming pace, we need an urgent, coordinated and comprehensive national review, driving prompt action including law changes to force improvements by our water companies, business and agriculture.

In this new series, Save the Planet lays down its manifesto for change – a “carrot and stick” approach of strengthening regulations with punitive penalties for failure, yet actively promoting and rewarding sustainable initiatives for a better future.

There are several pragmatic and effective measures that the UK could take to fix the high levels of contamination and pollution of its rivers and inland coastal waters. These include:

Strengthening regulations: To reduce pollution levels in rivers and inland coastal waters, the UK government must strengthen existing regulations or enact new ones. Setting even stricter limits on pollutant discharge from industrial and agricultural activities, for example.

Increasing monitoring: The government must conduct more extensive monitoring of water quality in rivers and inland coastal waters in order to identify pollution hotspots and take action to address them, including the use of new technologies such as sensors to monitor water quality in real time.

Promoting sustainable agriculture: Agricultural activities are a major source of pollution in rivers and inland coastal waters. The government should increase its promotion of sustainable agriculture practices that reduce fertiliser and pesticide use, as well as encourage farmers to adopt more environmentally friendly practices.

Encouraging public participation: The government must encourage the public to participate in efforts to reduce pollution in rivers and inland coastal waters. This will include campaigns to raise awareness of the issue and encourage people to report pollution incidents.

Investing in infrastructure: To improve the quality of water in rivers and inland coastal waters, the government must expand infrastructure such as water treatment plants. This will include upgrading existing infrastructure or constructing new facilities in underserved areas.

Collaborating with stakeholders: The government must collaborate with stakeholders such as industry, agriculture, and environmental groups to develop solutions to reduce pollution in rivers and inland coastal waters – working together to develop and implement best practices for reducing pollution.

Overall, a comprehensive approach that combines legislative measures, increased monitoring, sustainable practices, public participation, infrastructure investments, and stakeholder collaboration is needed to fix the high levels of contamination and pollution in Britain’s rivers and inland coastal waters.

Welsh Coastal Areas Named Among UK’s Most Polluted Due to Sewage Contamination

By David Shepherd|2023-02-25T14:12:36+00:00February 25th, 2023|

Two Welsh coastal areas have been identified as some of the most highly-polluted spots in the UK due to sewage contamination.

The latest figures illustrate the dismal state of many bodies of water due to contamination from water firms.

Two north Welsh locations have made it into the top ten – Rhyl and Morfa Nefyn – while the Menai Strait has also secured a spot in the top twenty. The Environment Agency and Natural Resources Wales have revealed that sewage was pumped into waterways for 3.4 million hours in only one year, which can be translated to 388 years.

This issue has been brought to light by highlighting that the River Severn, which divides England and Wales, was suffering from severe pollution due to the 28,000 hours of sewage pumped into it by Severn Trent Water over 2,656 times.

Other rivers listed in the top 20 include River Teifi, River Usk, River Wye, River Tawe and and River Taf. Gwent river pollution by sewage

Welsh Water, also known as Dŵr Cymru, said it was “unsurprising” that Wales had greater numbers of spills than other countries, going on to blame storm overflows and rainfall.

“Welsh Water has monitors on 99% of our storm overflows, more than any other water company, and given Wales also receives more rainfall than England this results in these storm overflows operating more often.

“It is therefore unsurprising that we currently record larger numbers of spills than others.”

Storm overflows act as safety valves, releasing extra sewage into rivers, lakes or the ocean when weather conditions cause excess rainfall. This stops properties from becoming flooded and saves them from sewage backing up into their streets and homes during extreme weather events.

The water company concluded to state that it was continuing to “protect the environment” and “assess the impact of storm overflows” to work to improve the problem.

“We are investing over £900m to protect the environment between 2020 and 2025. With 44% of Welsh rivers achieving good ecological status, compared to 16% in England, we are playing our part by investing to prevent any water body in Wales failing good ecological status by 2030 as a result of our wastewater treatment works.”

Undertones singer and fisherman Feargal Sharkey had something to say about the figures outlined on ‘Top of the Poops’ – tweeting:“What on earth is going on in Wales, Welsh Water with an utterly despicable record of six of the most polluted rivers. Get a grip.”

In a statement, Natural Resources Wales explained it was “concerned about the impact of storm discharges on our water quality”, and added a taskforce has since been set up to help reduce the impact.

“The taskforce brings together Welsh Government, NRW, Ofwat, Dŵr Cymru and Hafren Dyfrdwy, with independent advice from Afonydd Cymru and the Consumer Council for Water. Collaboratively, the Taskforce has published a series of action plans to gather greater evidence on the impact of storm overflows on our rivers and the sea to reduce the impacts they cause, to improve regulation and to educate the public on sewer misuse.”

It added that water companies have a “responsibility to the environment” and need to start taking the issue “seriously”: “We will continue to challenge the water companies to make sure storm overflows are properly controlled. We will investigate any cases of non-compliance and where appropriate take the required enforcement action.”