Originally published on
by at Arctic News
The report has severe shortcomings, including:
The IPCC makes it look as if the temperature rise could be restricted to 1.5°C above pre-industrial and insists there was a carbon budget left, to be divided by using monetary analysis.
This narrative results in a failure to highlight in the SPM some key drivers of change (such as heat pumps in buildings and air taxis in transport) and in inappropriately referring to such key drivers of change as ‘options’, while failing to mention the best policies to achieve the necessary changes, i.e. through local feebates.
|[ from IPCC AR6 WGIII SPM, click images to enlarge ]|
These are not genuinely options, since the dire situation leaves little choice and instead makes it imperative to act most urgently, comprehensively and effectively on climate change, in line with the Paris Agreement.
|[ from earlier post ]|
The Climate Plan prefers local feebates. Where necessary, fees can be set high enough to effectively ban specific alternatives.
|[ Image from the 2014 post Biochar Builds Real Assets ]|
Furthermore, instead of using money, local councils could add extra fees to rates for land where soil carbon falls, while using all the revenues for rebates on rates for land where soil carbon rises.
• Secretary-General Warns of Climate Emergency, Calling Intergovernmental Panel’s Report ‘a File of Shame’, While Saying Leaders ‘Are Lying’, Fuelling Flames
• Mitigation of Climate Change Report 2022: “Litany of broken climate promises” – UN Chief
• IPCC Climate Change 2022 – Mitigation of Climate Change – Summary for Policymakers
• IPCC special report Climate Change and Land
• IPCC Report Climate Change and Land
• Confirm Methane’s Importance